Home
News
Prayer
Humor
Photo Gallery
H.I.T
Ministries
Church History
Book Reviews
Featured Articles
Leadership
Ethics
Glory
Wonderful Words
Links
Archives
Forum
Contact
 

           

 

BAPTISM

What? Where? Who? How? Why? When?

What is baptism? Immersion. Baptize comes from the Greek baptizo, which means to dip or plunge. The word was frequently used in secular settings referring to, for example, submerging cloth in dye to change its color. Such action necessitates immersion of the cloth in the dye, and so this word, which means dip or plunge, was used. The text specifically being baptized in water (Matthew 3:6; Mark 1:5; Acts 8:38), and also says John chose a baptismal spot because "there was plenty of water" (John 3:23).

Where are people to be baptized? Wherever enough water is for true baptism, that is, immersion. John the Baptist, baptized people in the Jordan River (Matthew 3:6 and Mark 1:5, again). Jesus' disciples probably also did at first, since Jesus started his ministry at Jordan. Later, Jesus spent much of his ministry near the Sea of Galilee. Cornelius (Acts 10) lived in Caesarea, which is on the Mediterranean Sea coast. Ephesus (Acts 19) is a sea port which Paul, however, approached from the land road through the interior--the text does not say where in that big city Paul baptized.

Some people say a baptism MUST be conducted in an ocean or river, but the Ethiopian (Acts 8) was baptized somewhere along the road between Jerusalem and Gaza, not necessarily in a river. The Philippian jailer and his family (Acts 16:33) were baptized where the Paul's and Silas' wounds were washed, very probably not the sea, since salt water would have pained the wounds.

The text doesn't mention in exactly what water 3,000 people were baptized on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2), nor the Samaritans (Acts 8). However, we see variety in places of baptism, as long as enough water was there for immersion, since that's what baptism is.

Who is to be baptized, and who baptizes them? Everyone who believes and repents. John baptized people from the whole surrounding area who came to him and confessed their sins (Matthew 3:5-6; Mark 1:5). He demanded that they change their lifestyle afterwards (Luke 3:10-14). Jesus' disciples baptized people who had been following John (John 3:26) and baptized many more than John did (4:1-2). Jesus told us to baptize everyone (Matthew 28:19), and Peter told everyone to repent and be baptized (Acts 2:38). In New Testament times, everyone who believed was baptized (Acts 2:41; 8:12,37; 10:2 and 47; 16:31-33; 18:8; 19:2-5). When we see WHY people are baptized, we understand why everyone needs to be.

And who should conduct baptism? Disciples did, apostles did, deacons evangelizing (Acts 8) did. The main point is how it's done, not who does it.

How is this to be done? In Jesus name. The disciples had been baptizing by Jesus' authority already (John 4:1-2) even before John the Baptist died. After they had been with him for three years, Jesus, just before his passion, told them that, although they couldn't remember for the moment all He was telling them, when the Holy Spirit came, He would remind them of everything and also lead and guide them into all truth (John 14:26; 16:13). After He rose again, He told them to baptize everyone in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19), that they should preach repentance and remission of sins in His name (Luke 24:48), that they were witnesses (Luke 24:48; Acts 1:8) and repeated the promise of the Holy Spirit and power (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4).

On the Day of Pentecost, as soon as they received the Holy Spirit and power (Acts 2:4), they preached that (Acts 2:14-21), preached Jesus (Acts 2:22-36) and preached repentance and remission of sins (Acts 2:37-38) closing again with the promise (Acts 2:39) and the importance of salvation (Acts 2:40). They baptized in Jesus name (Acts 8:16; 10:48; 19:5), healed in Jesus name (Acts 3:6;9:17-18,34), proclaimed this healing as being in Jesus name (Acts 3:16; 4:9-10); cast out devils in Jesus name (Acts 16:18); preached Jesus (Acts 3:13-15, 17-26; 4:2,11-12,33; 5:30-32; 7:52-53,56; 8:5,12, 30-35; 9:17,20-22,28; 10:36-43; 11:16-17,20; 13:23-39; 15:11; 16:31; 17:2-3,18,31; 18:5,25,28; 19:4,13; 20:21,35; 22:8-10,14-16; 24:24; 25:19; 26:8-9,14-18,23; 28:23,31), prayed in reference to Jesus (Acts 4:27,30; 7:59), rejoiced that they could suffer for Jesus name's sake (Acts 5:32; 15:26; 20:24; 21:13; ) and the whole assembly highly honored Jesus name (Acts 19:17). They were Jesus Christ's representatives on earth--earthly ambassadors of a heavenly kingdom. They were called Christians (Acts 11:26; 26:28). The Sanhedrin and other enemies of the gospel acknowledged that the great importance and power lay in the name of Jesus (Acts 4:17-18; 5:28,40; 6:14) and saw that these people had been with Him (Acts 4:13). (I use texts here only specifically mentioning Jesus name, not ones mentioning no name or title at all, or say simply "the Lord," since my purpose is to show all the texts showing explicit reference in various ways to Jesus name directly.)

All this fulfilled Jesus own command that "in his name" they would heal the sick, cast out demons, speak with new tongues, and so on (Mark 16:17-18) and preach (Luke 24:47).

Some people, wanting to preserve their old, tradition-based baptismal practice, have said that "in Jesus name" means only "by Jesus authority," whereas "in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost" indicates liturgy formula. This is an arbitrary distinction--one could as easily say that "in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost" means "by the authority," and that "in the name of Jesus," indicates baptismal formula, and the texts in Acts indicate that the apostles baptized-every time a liturgy is mentioned--in Jesus name.

Why would the apostles interpret Jesus command of Matthew 28:19 this way? Because they had heard Him say that He had come in His Father's name (John 5:43), whom the Father had given Jesus (John 17:11), and that Holy Spirit would come in Jesus name (John 14:26). Since there is only one God (Deuteronomy 6:4), whom Jesus had said is Spirit (John 4:24), it followed that this Holy Spirit Jesus spoke of was God Himself, whom Jesus had said was also in Him (John 5) and would be in them. Jesus said He, Himself, would be in them (John 14:17). Since, again, there is only one God, it was clear that the Spirit Who created the world (Genesis 1:2), the Holy Spirit, and the Spirit in Jesus was all the same Spirit. Therefore, the apostles could use the terms "Spirit of Jesus" and "Holy Spirit" interchangeably (Acts 16:6-7). The same God was showing Himself in different ways, and the name applicable was the name of Jesus.

Someone might ask, "How about the name Jehovah?" Moses had heard God identify Himself as "I AM" at the burning bush." "I AM" what? I AM THAT I AM. Moses thereafter referred to God as "YHWH," which is variously translated as "The Eternal," "The Self-Existent One," "The Self-Revealing One"--it's the third person equivalent of I AM, I.e. HE IS. The Jews would have probably pronounced YHWH as "Yahweh," if they had been willing to pronounce it at all. Instead they considered it too holy to speak, so would substitute the word, "Adonai" for it in public reading. The juxtaposition of Adonai's vowels into YHWH's consonants led to the hybrid term, "Jehovah," which is not in Hebrew text.

Again, the question comes, "HE IS what?" The Jews added titles indicating God's various attributes: YHWH-Jireh (HE IS my provider), and so on, including "YHWH-Shua" (HE IS my Savior). This shortened to Yah-shua, or with an English J, Joshua, and in the New Testament, influenced by Greek and by English pronunciation, Jesus. So the name Jesus connects to the ancient name, YHWH, and refers to God saving us, bringing us to baptism's purpose.

Why should people be baptized? What is it for? For forgiveness (=remission) of sins, for salvation, to identify with Jesus' death and burial, as part of our new birth, and as part of putting on Christ.

 

  1. The same Greek word is variously translated in the King James Version as remission and forgiveness, therefore English language distinctions of meaning between these two words are irrelevant to our purpose. The same Greek words is used throughout, and the NIV translates it forgiveness each time. Jesus said that "repentance and remission [forgiveness] of sins were to be preached" in His name in all nations, beginning in Jerusalem, and Peter did this on the Day of Pentecost by telling them, "Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins." Peter Paul said in his own testimony that Ananias had told him to immediately get baptized, washing away his sins (Acts 22:16).

  2. Jesus (Mark 16:16), Peter (1 Peter 3:21) and Paul (Titus 3:5) all say this washing is part of our salvation.

  3. Paul once says that we are baptized into Jesus death (Romans 6:3) and twice that we are buried with Him in baptism (Romans 6:4; Colossians 2:12).

  4. We are to be "born of water and Spirit" (John 3:5) just as Israel was "baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea (1 Corinthians 10:2), yet not fall away as they did (1 Corinthians 10:6). These are the "baptisms" mentioned in Hebrews 6:2. There are two baptisms--water and Spirit; the singular "one baptism" of Ephesians 4:5, read in the context of 4:2-7, speaks of the one baptism the entire Early Church practiced--which was Jesus name immersion, as we have seen: one baptism, just as they all worshipped one God, Lord of them all, and had one faith and belonged to one Body--hence the command to bear with each other in love and keep unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace (v. 2-3). Some people ask about rebaptism in water. This takes place, as in Ephesus, when believers (Acts 19:1-2), already baptized, but not in Jesus name (Acts 19:3), are rebaptized, this time in Jesus name (Acts 19:5). There is no Biblical record of people previously baptized with the words "in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost" being repeated over them, and then later baptized in Jesus name, for the simple reason that baptism in the titular formula was not used in Bible days, but was rather a post-apostolic interpretation and practice.

  5. We put on Christ in both water baptism in Jesus name (Galations 3:27) and Spirit baptism speaking in other tongues as the Spirit enables (Luke 24:49; Acts 2:4).


When are we to be immersed in Jesus name in water? As soon as we believe in Jesus and repent of our sins. On the Day of Pentecost, the 3,000 were baptized that same day (Acts 2:41). The Samaritans were baptized as soon as they believed (Acts 8:12), and the Ethiopian interrupted Philip's sermon to ask for baptism, which he received immediately (Acts 8:36-38). Paul was baptized without delay (Acts 9:18; 22:16). Cornelius' household, who had already received the Holy Spirit, were ordered to be baptized in Jesus name, which happened within a few days at the most (Acts 10:48). The Philippian believers (Acts 16:13-15) and jailor (Acts 16:31-33) were baptized immediately, the jailor without even waiting for the sun to rise. The Ephesian elders, like the Samaritans and everyone else mentioned in this paragraph, were baptized as soon as they believed (Acts 19:5). Immediately.

Summary: baptism is immersion in any large enough body of water, upon belief in Jesus as Son of God and as Savior from sin and upon repentance, in Jesus name for the forgiveness of sins, to be buried with Jesus, to put on Christ, to be saved. It is for everyone-- now. This is the way Jesus' apostles, who had lived with him for three years, who had seen him on earth in ministry and after his resurrection, obeyed His command and wrote it down for us to follow. Now if we have true wisdom, we must do it (Matthew 7:24; James 1:22-25).
Back to top

Media

Marshall MacLuhan years ago contrasted print and electronic media as being "warm" and "cool" media respectively. (Now even music recorded by analog and digitally has divided into "warm" and "cool" sound camps.) MacLuhan called the medium the message and the massage, so perhaps Britain's and America's differing movie industries offer a look at different cultures.

England's and America's movies differ in several respects. For instance, British scriptwriters still frequently take inspiration from literature, resulting in scripts stronger in characterization and in theme. This gives British actresses a chance to portray fuller, more complex characters (Jane Austen's protagonists have more to them psychologically than American action movie girlfriend sidekicks).

America's scriptwriters have tended to cut straight to visual effects, resulting in strong camera work, but little actual thought. Perhaps this tendency is to play to the strong point of camera work--expressing emotion, in contrast to the camera's weakness--as Orson Welles once said, "the camera is still unable to photograph thought, and as such remains a blunt instrument." Some novelists, such as Gore Vidal, now talk of "cine-literacy," but the camera does not engage in literacy so much as in the direct portrayal of images appealing more to direct senses than to good sense.

America's tradition of separation between church and state, and Hollywood's strong stance against Christianity in general, have resulted in scripts, except for the occasional documentary, almost obligated to slam Christian belief. Britain's possession of a state church has allowed its writers to speak of Christian faith, even to use of words, like "gospel," frequently associated in America only with the religious right in the political spectrum. This comes, ironically, at a time when Britain's church attendance on any given Sunday is about 2% of the population, and America's is much higher than that.
Back to top

Curmudgeons and Conundrums

Q: Should Jews who believe in Jesus as Messiah attend churches organized only for Jewish Christians (commonly called “Messianic” churches) or should they mainstream into churches with Gentile believers?

A: (by various people).

Charles McGrath, a Gentile who attends a Messianic congregation, says many outside observers “simply dislike the fundamental message, Christianity is Jewish,” Many Christians don’t like the implication that the church is closer to Judaism than it would care to admit. And unbelieving Jews do not like the message that Christianity is in essence a Jewish olive tree growing to fruition in Messiah (with an accommodation of the Gentiles)....As a Gentile believer, I always appreciate the niche being filled in Messianic Judaism by providing a place for Jews to worship their Messiah without forsaking their cultural traditions and ethnic heritage. In fact, their Jewish heritage becomes more fulfilling and meaningful in Messiah....the real recipient of accommodation is the “wild olive branch” of the believing Gentiles. It was ten chapters into the Book of Acts before the major grafting of Gentiles was initiated, and not until the Jerusalem council that the Nazarene Jews met to decide how to accommodate the Gentiles into this new (renewed) covenant of promise with Israel. Over the course of history, the roles have become reversed as the Gentile-dominated church has, in effect, erased its Jewish roots. The net effect of church history has been to accomplish implicitly what the heretic Marcion tried to do explicitly in the second century as he tried to eliminate anything Jewish from the Scriptures....Messianic Judaism, by its very existence, points to the need for...growth of the body of Messiah throughout history in which the Gentiles are demoted to a single branch grafted into an olive tree that continues to be Jewish....such a theological framework has great potential for unifying the church and ultimately ushering in the time Paul talks about in Romans 11 when “all Israel will be saved.”

Mitch Glaser, president of Chosen People Ministries, points out that Messianic congregations existed in Warsaw, Odessa, Kiev, Budapest and Romania for decades back into the 1920s or earlier.

Arnold Fruchtenbaum, director of Ariel Ministries, says that a “very small minority” of Messianic congregations are “not interested in any of the cultural trappings of Gentile Christianity, unless those cultural practices reflect a specific, biblically prescribed practice,” but that for the rest of them “much of the theology and practice is directly borrowed from traditional Pentecostal theology, and other elements have been incorporated from the more recent charismatic movements of a variety of kinds.”

Jerome Tracy mentions “Elias Friedman, a convert from Judaism, now a Carmelite monk living in Israel,” who founded the Association of Hebrew Catholics.

Richard Ellison says, “We who have been born again are believers in the Lord Jesus, and hyphenating ourselves is spiritual immaturity....God has declared, there is no distinction between Jew and Greek”....There are Jewish or Hebrew believers, whichever term you may prefer, but from a New Testament point of view, there are no such things as Messianic Jews, or Hebrew Christians, spiritually speaking. God is no longer offering a Messiah to the world but the Savior....I oppose any attempt to make the Lord’s redemptive work somehow incomplete for Jewish people if it does not incorporate Jewish tradition as a spiritual part. The offense of the cross is no less today than in Paul’s day.” [Ed: Ellison goes overboard in the opposite direction that McGrath did. Messianic Jews are not, for the most part, saying that fulfilling the law is required for their salvation; they are just trying to worship in a way true to their cultural heritage, as do people all over the world.]

Vincent Gustafson says, “Whether Jew of Gentile, those who profess Messiah as Lord are baptized by the Holy Spirit into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13). First used in Antioch (Acts 11:26), the name Christian was given to professing believers signifying a new life under grace. That name has remained in use to this present day. Do we really need another division within the body?” [Ed: Gustafson apparently doesn’t know how Spirit baptism takes place, but he’s right that the word Christian is Biblically based. Since it specifically refers to followers of Jesus as being confessors that Jesus is the Messiah--Christ is simply Greek for the Hebrew word Messiah--Jewish Christians should find Christian an ideal designation.]

Stan Keller of Sheresh Ministries says, “The word Christian is biblical. I do not refer to myself as a Jewish Christian, but I do not shy away from that reference either....I find that Gentile believers assume that if you are a “Messianic Jew” you automatically attend a Messianic congregation. The fact is, a large portion of Jewish believers attend mainline or independent churches....the beauty of being in the “regular” church all these years is that it has provided a natural springboard to the rest of the body for teaching and consulting, because other believers have felt that I am a part of who they are.”

Rob Gray, on the other hand, is the only member of his Jewish family who is now in a Messianic congregation. He says extended family “would say that being Jewish is something their ancestors were.” He asks, “Can it plausibly be God’s will that each Jewish person who comes to faith melts into the body as a whole, losing all identity? If so, why do Paul and James take such trouble to disabuse fellow Jews--believers and nonbelievers alike--that Paul did not encourage Jewish believers to forsake the Torah?” [Ed: people on both sides of this question quote Scripture. Perhaps the answer lies in Paul’s life, practice and teaching. He personally followed Jewish law when with the Jews to the extent of shaving his head in consummation of a vow and also to circumcising half-Jewish Timothy. But he did not circumcise Titus or other Gentile and strongly resisted attempts to make Gentile converts obey Jewish law. Conclusion: If Jewish Christians don’t make observance of the Law a requirement for salvation, adding to the work of Jesus Christ, they should be permitted, if they choose, to belong to Messianic congregations.]

Back to top

Health

Alcohol and Drug Use

Howard Pastorella in his article in Freedomline (Volume 18, No. 3, page 4), encourages congregations to start a CIP (Christian Intervention Program) and reach out to prisoners in their area. Officers of the Courts and other community leaders are introduced to the pastor, local church CIP coordinator and congregation who want to be part of the solution to the problems of alcohol and drug use in their communities. The officials, happy that someone will volunteer to become involved in their own communities, frequently thank the churches for caring.

Smoking

Secondhand smoke caused 35,000 to 62,000 USA deaths from heart disease, 3,000 from lung cancer, and 1,900 to 2,700 from sudden infant death syndrome each year, reports The Orlando Sentinel newspaper. Secondhand smoke also accounts for 9,700 to 18,600 low birth-weight babies, 8,000 to 26,000 new cases of asthma in children, an increase in asthma symptoms among 400,000 to 1 million children and 150,000 to 300,000 cases of bronchitis or pneumonia in children eighteen months or younger--of which up to 15,000 require hospitalization.

The Environmental Protection Agency has classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen, a rating used only for substances proved to cause cancer.

Secondhand smoke exposes everyone to risk. The more exposure you have to secondhand smoke, the more risk you nhave from one of those diseases or acute respiratory problems.

Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco, recently interviewed and tested 53 bartenders in San Francisco before and after a new statewide ban on smoking in bars and taverns. Before the smoking ban went into effect, 39 of the bartenders reported respiratory symptoms; less than two months after the ban, the number had fallen to 16, according to the study published 9 December 1998 in Journal of the American Medical Association. Before the ban, 41 bartenders reported having "sensory irritation': after the ban only nine still had symptoms. Tests also show an overall improvement in lung function among all those tested.

Airline flights and many public places, including most enclosed shopping malls, now prohibit smoking.
Back to top

Message Outlines

I. Introduction: The Purpose of Light
"For it is light that makes everything visible. This is why it is said, '...Christ will shine on you'" (Ephesians 5:14).

II. The Sources of Light
     A. God's Word
"And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts" (2 Peter 1:19).
     B. Creation
"For God, who said, 'Let light shine out of darkness,' has made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ" (2 Corinthians 4:6).

III. The Effect of Light in Our Lives
     A. Inner Change
"He will make your righteousness shine like the dawn, the justice of your cause like the noonday sun" (Psalm 37:6).
     B. Outer Behavior
"You are the light of the world....let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven" (Matthew 5:14,16).
     C. Witness
"Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD rises upon you. See, darkness covers the earth, and thick darkness is over the peoples, but the LORD rises upon you and his glory appears over you. Nations will come to your light,and kings to the brightness of your dawn" (Isaiah 60:1-3).

IV. The Reward of Light is Eternal Light
"Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever" (Daniel 12:3). "Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father" (Matthew 13:43).

V. Conclusion: Encouragement because
"You shine like stars in the universe as you hold out the word of life" (Philippians 2:15-16).

Back to Top

 
 

©2001 Stanley Scism